<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Publishing Revisited: A Discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briankeene.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265</link>
	<description>The Official Website of Author Brian Keene</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:02:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GNBraun</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-11694</link>
		<dc:creator>GNBraun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-11694</guid>
		<description>Complete agreement with everything, and well-put, besides...

An author with an established fanbase and out-of-print stuff, or new stuff that&#039;s been professionally edited, is perfectly justified to self-publish in the current climate.

For new authors; forget it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complete agreement with everything, and well-put, besides&#8230;</p>
<p>An author with an established fanbase and out-of-print stuff, or new stuff that&#8217;s been professionally edited, is perfectly justified to self-publish in the current climate.</p>
<p>For new authors; forget it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ducky_love</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-10865</link>
		<dc:creator>ducky_love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-10865</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always so late on these - I stumble in from Twitter.  I just wanted to add that I search your name on B&amp;N Ebooks at least once a week.  If something was added there I would buy it in a heartbeat, I don&#039;t care who publishes it.  And if something was self published anywhere that was compatible with my Nook I would figure out how to make it work.  

You&#039;re the only author I still buy paper for.. everything else is all digital from now on.  

ps- I would also buy Deluge when it is finished!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always so late on these &#8211; I stumble in from Twitter.  I just wanted to add that I search your name on B&amp;N Ebooks at least once a week.  If something was added there I would buy it in a heartbeat, I don&#8217;t care who publishes it.  And if something was self published anywhere that was compatible with my Nook I would figure out how to make it work.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re the only author I still buy paper for.. everything else is all digital from now on.  </p>
<p>ps- I would also buy Deluge when it is finished!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-10862</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-10862</guid>
		<description>The more midlist horror stories I hear, I think the print bottom will fall out except for bestsellers--maybe two years, maybe 10 years. But the bottom will fall out of ebooks when there are 20 million different titles available (that&#039;s within reason, since there were a million new titles last year). Even now it&#039;s hard enough to stand out in a sea of bobbing flotsam.

Scott Nicholson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more midlist horror stories I hear, I think the print bottom will fall out except for bestsellers&#8211;maybe two years, maybe 10 years. But the bottom will fall out of ebooks when there are 20 million different titles available (that&#8217;s within reason, since there were a million new titles last year). Even now it&#8217;s hard enough to stand out in a sea of bobbing flotsam.</p>
<p>Scott Nicholson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Edward Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8801</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Edward Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8801</guid>
		<description>I’m a little late posting on this thread. By the way Brian, great discussion. If I might add a little more fuel to the fire it would be about the possible future of publishing. In September of last year my novella, The Haunting of Sam Cabot, was published by the small press, Damnation Books. Since then, Kindle sales have outrun hard copy sales by nearly twenty to one. I think it’s telling. For the most part I don’t think readers care where their content comes from as long as they get to read something new from their favorite authors. We live in an instant gratification society. Kindle is fast and cheap, and I know from some of the letters I’m getting that new readers are more apt to take a chance on something new if they don’t have to spend an arm and a leg. Well, there’s my two cents. 
As far as you’re personal concerns about backlists and such, well. You don’t need advice from me. Seems you’re doing quite well without it. Keep putting out those fine reads. I don’t think it matters who publishes your work, just make it available and it will sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a little late posting on this thread. By the way Brian, great discussion. If I might add a little more fuel to the fire it would be about the possible future of publishing. In September of last year my novella, The Haunting of Sam Cabot, was published by the small press, Damnation Books. Since then, Kindle sales have outrun hard copy sales by nearly twenty to one. I think it’s telling. For the most part I don’t think readers care where their content comes from as long as they get to read something new from their favorite authors. We live in an instant gratification society. Kindle is fast and cheap, and I know from some of the letters I’m getting that new readers are more apt to take a chance on something new if they don’t have to spend an arm and a leg. Well, there’s my two cents.<br />
As far as you’re personal concerns about backlists and such, well. You don’t need advice from me. Seems you’re doing quite well without it. Keep putting out those fine reads. I don’t think it matters who publishes your work, just make it available and it will sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Laimo</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8677</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Laimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8677</guid>
		<description>Beautifully said, Brian. Intense read...and well thought out. I couldn&#039;t agree more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautifully said, Brian. Intense read&#8230;and well thought out. I couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8675</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8675</guid>
		<description>James, that&#039;s sound drunk writing, the way I did with about four novels. I agree it&#039;s perfect for out-of-print works that were published through traditional means (assuming the author has a clean copy of all the changes). Having edited a number of books, and seen early-draft work, there are some sloppy pros out there--go to Stephanie Meyer&#039;s Web site and see what she posts for millions of eyeballs--I wouldn&#039;t let my daughter read it.

The resurgence theory makes sense, but then there&#039;s the same question of why books get bumped off the shelves in the first place. Limited space. New products. Midlist authors are squeezed between the flood of this month&#039;s releases and the stacked bricks of Twilight, Potter, King, Koontz, Brown, and Janet Evanovich.

Ebooks don&#039;t have this problem. But right now ereaders are skewed toward thrillers, SF, technofiction and Christian fiction, based on my observations of the past few weeks. I&#039;ve been brainstorming lots of ideas about this new frontier, but believe it or not, I think the ebook window is really only about 5 to 10 years, and then everything can be stolen so easily that writers will face the problems of musicians, except we can&#039;t give concerts (unless we&#039;re Brian Keene, members of SMASH-CUT, or the few other authors who have a true cult following).

I don&#039;t think reading will be dead, and I think there will be bookstores and paper books and ebooks. But I think there will be a ton of other things as well. A new type of storytelling no one&#039;s figured out yet (this from trying to squeeze comic books onto the current ereaders--can&#039;t even imagine what a phone screen would do to them).

I guess the larger issue is self-reliance versus needing &quot;the big boys,&quot; as Tim called them. At what point do you need big boys if you&#039;re a big boy yourself? I keep thinking how Stephen King put out The Plant and seemed scared by the power he had...he couldn&#039;t even finish it. I think the prospects were too unmooring. Practically everything he&#039;d built his career on had shifted with a few strokes of the keyboard. And this was, what, 10 years ago?

JA Konrath is the perfect example of a writer who became the new industry--feet in both worlds. I think the major publishers were a little intimidated by what he was doing so they jumped on his bandwagon before it left without them. Scott Sigler, Dave Wellington, Cory Doctorow, others. And they are not even a real heavyweights on the order of King-Koontz-Patterson. Makes you wonder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, that&#8217;s sound drunk writing, the way I did with about four novels. I agree it&#8217;s perfect for out-of-print works that were published through traditional means (assuming the author has a clean copy of all the changes). Having edited a number of books, and seen early-draft work, there are some sloppy pros out there&#8211;go to Stephanie Meyer&#8217;s Web site and see what she posts for millions of eyeballs&#8211;I wouldn&#8217;t let my daughter read it.</p>
<p>The resurgence theory makes sense, but then there&#8217;s the same question of why books get bumped off the shelves in the first place. Limited space. New products. Midlist authors are squeezed between the flood of this month&#8217;s releases and the stacked bricks of Twilight, Potter, King, Koontz, Brown, and Janet Evanovich.</p>
<p>Ebooks don&#8217;t have this problem. But right now ereaders are skewed toward thrillers, SF, technofiction and Christian fiction, based on my observations of the past few weeks. I&#8217;ve been brainstorming lots of ideas about this new frontier, but believe it or not, I think the ebook window is really only about 5 to 10 years, and then everything can be stolen so easily that writers will face the problems of musicians, except we can&#8217;t give concerts (unless we&#8217;re Brian Keene, members of SMASH-CUT, or the few other authors who have a true cult following).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think reading will be dead, and I think there will be bookstores and paper books and ebooks. But I think there will be a ton of other things as well. A new type of storytelling no one&#8217;s figured out yet (this from trying to squeeze comic books onto the current ereaders&#8211;can&#8217;t even imagine what a phone screen would do to them).</p>
<p>I guess the larger issue is self-reliance versus needing &#8220;the big boys,&#8221; as Tim called them. At what point do you need big boys if you&#8217;re a big boy yourself? I keep thinking how Stephen King put out The Plant and seemed scared by the power he had&#8230;he couldn&#8217;t even finish it. I think the prospects were too unmooring. Practically everything he&#8217;d built his career on had shifted with a few strokes of the keyboard. And this was, what, 10 years ago?</p>
<p>JA Konrath is the perfect example of a writer who became the new industry&#8211;feet in both worlds. I think the major publishers were a little intimidated by what he was doing so they jumped on his bandwagon before it left without them. Scott Sigler, Dave Wellington, Cory Doctorow, others. And they are not even a real heavyweights on the order of King-Koontz-Patterson. Makes you wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Roy Daley</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8674</link>
		<dc:creator>James Roy Daley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8674</guid>
		<description>Hey Brian. 

Here are some points that seem to be jumping off the page: 

1)	Fans will buy your work regardless of the pipe it travels.

2)	Tim Lebbon says: “Don’t release Ishtar… you don’t want to explain poor sales the next time you’re talking business with the big boys. 

3)	John Shipp says: “If you don’t swing the bat, you’ll never hit a homerun.”

4)	A.P Fuchs &amp; Carlton Mellick III are saying, “Do it, but don’t go cheap, easy and fast (Lulu &amp; CreateSpace), turn it into an occupation, because in the end you’ll earn more money (assuming you don’t lose money not writing that next book).  

5)	Colum says: “Start a super group.”

6)	Ron Clinton backs that up, pointing out United Artists.

7)	Jon F. Merz says: “I made 10 grand. How do you like them apples?”

I’m going to say this: 

If you want to become a publisher, listen to A.P. and Mellick. 

If you want to run an organization, listen to Colum. 

If you want to stick extra money into your pocket without a million headaches, listen to your fans, Tim, John &amp; Jon. Here’s why: 

If you release one of your early books on CreateSpace, you won’t have to talk numbers with the big boys, you fans will still buy it, you might hit a homerun, you might stick an extra $10,000 into your pocket, it won’t turn into a big, time gobbling headache, and––because CreateSpace signed with Ingram––Borders &amp; Waldenbooks (and whoever else) will be able to stock the title. 

And… the buyers in those stores know who you are. Hell, if you spent a day firing off emails to those buyers, the title would likely have a resurgence. Worst case scenario, the book doesn’t sell. Big deal. At least you didn’t waste much time, or money, or put a question mark into that next business meeting. At least you stepped up to the plate and took a swing. 

But what do I know? 

I’m drunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brian. </p>
<p>Here are some points that seem to be jumping off the page: </p>
<p>1)	Fans will buy your work regardless of the pipe it travels.</p>
<p>2)	Tim Lebbon says: “Don’t release Ishtar… you don’t want to explain poor sales the next time you’re talking business with the big boys. </p>
<p>3)	John Shipp says: “If you don’t swing the bat, you’ll never hit a homerun.”</p>
<p>4)	A.P Fuchs &amp; Carlton Mellick III are saying, “Do it, but don’t go cheap, easy and fast (Lulu &amp; CreateSpace), turn it into an occupation, because in the end you’ll earn more money (assuming you don’t lose money not writing that next book).  </p>
<p>5)	Colum says: “Start a super group.”</p>
<p>6)	Ron Clinton backs that up, pointing out United Artists.</p>
<p>7)	Jon F. Merz says: “I made 10 grand. How do you like them apples?”</p>
<p>I’m going to say this: </p>
<p>If you want to become a publisher, listen to A.P. and Mellick. </p>
<p>If you want to run an organization, listen to Colum. </p>
<p>If you want to stick extra money into your pocket without a million headaches, listen to your fans, Tim, John &amp; Jon. Here’s why: </p>
<p>If you release one of your early books on CreateSpace, you won’t have to talk numbers with the big boys, you fans will still buy it, you might hit a homerun, you might stick an extra $10,000 into your pocket, it won’t turn into a big, time gobbling headache, and––because CreateSpace signed with Ingram––Borders &amp; Waldenbooks (and whoever else) will be able to stock the title. </p>
<p>And… the buyers in those stores know who you are. Hell, if you spent a day firing off emails to those buyers, the title would likely have a resurgence. Worst case scenario, the book doesn’t sell. Big deal. At least you didn’t waste much time, or money, or put a question mark into that next business meeting. At least you stepped up to the plate and took a swing. </p>
<p>But what do I know? </p>
<p>I’m drunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8667</guid>
		<description>Hello!

Just my 2cents....but as long as you did a nice job making it a truely nice collectible, I see no problem with trying self publishing. Seems like more of the profits would be yours to keep. You may or may not be rediculed by your peers, but I wouldn&#039;t know about that part. Ask them....you know them. :)  (Ask Coop....if he says not to give a fuck, then don&#039;t...this life is for you anyway. Can&#039;t care too much of your peers opinions anyway).

Jade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>Just my 2cents&#8230;.but as long as you did a nice job making it a truely nice collectible, I see no problem with trying self publishing. Seems like more of the profits would be yours to keep. You may or may not be rediculed by your peers, but I wouldn&#8217;t know about that part. Ask them&#8230;.you know them. <img src='http://www.briankeene.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   (Ask Coop&#8230;.if he says not to give a fuck, then don&#8217;t&#8230;this life is for you anyway. Can&#8217;t care too much of your peers opinions anyway).</p>
<p>Jade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8648</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8648</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of a writer whose backlist has gone out of print self-publishing and selling them directly to fans. That, to my way of thinking, is the perfect use of the POD services. 

However, self-publishing new material... Might that not lead to some writers bypassing the usual editorial process? I&#039;ve seen a lot of work by pro-writers before an editor has polished it, and it&#039;s not as good as one might expect. I&#039;d need to be reassured that the words are of the same quality I&#039;d get from a reputable publisher before shelling out my hard-earned cash on a self-published title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of a writer whose backlist has gone out of print self-publishing and selling them directly to fans. That, to my way of thinking, is the perfect use of the POD services. </p>
<p>However, self-publishing new material&#8230; Might that not lead to some writers bypassing the usual editorial process? I&#8217;ve seen a lot of work by pro-writers before an editor has polished it, and it&#8217;s not as good as one might expect. I&#8217;d need to be reassured that the words are of the same quality I&#8217;d get from a reputable publisher before shelling out my hard-earned cash on a self-published title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Layng</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8646</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Layng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8646</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at the profit margins for two of the biggest self-publishing services right now, lulu and Createspace? It&#039;s better with Createspace than lulu, but the basics are that you can price a book at what you wish while keeping it affordable. Sounds great, until you factor in that you have to pay one or two editors (at anywhere from $10-$20 per 1K or words) to go over it and then pay an artist to design the image and layout of your cover and that comes out of the sales before you start actually seeing profits from your book. If you factor in those costs with the price of the book on top of the take the self-publishing service takes (pretty much the same cut as a mmpb publisher for only half the work) you are getting into territory that is prohibitive. Your collectibles buyer market will buy collectible books for $30-$40 a pop or more because the product they were buying was quality and not something they could find on the shelves of the local bookstores. Those kind of buyers won&#039;t necessarily buy a TPB for that price. Part of the problem with the self-publishing services is the issue of quality; pages missing, upside-down pages, missing text or ink smears and these aren&#039;t problems caused by the author but by the printer. No one is printing off a few copies to make sure it&#039;s coming out right before they print up a hundred or a thousand copies because they are printed individually and thirty or forty different authors a day. A few dozen crappy copies go out and you have the same problem you mentioned about the collectibles market. 

Then onto the cost of promotion. With a fanbase like yours it&#039;s not that much of an issue unless you want to widen your fanbase to increase sales so you can pay off those services you hired to help get it done right before the book hit print. You want to start seeing profit after forking out three grand or more for editing and artwork. The harsh reality of self-publishing is that it&#039;s not generally a good way to make money without putting out money and doing a lot of what your mmpb publisher does behind the scenes. If you want some good reading material google The Celestine Prophecy. That is a self-publishing success story. The author had already sold hundreds of thousands of copies before being bombarded by offers from publishing houses and sold a million copies after appearing on Oprah. I think the best think to do would be to do serious research on success vs cost of individual self-publishers and ask around at your current publishing houses in regards to how self-publishing might affect your relationship with them. 

Best wishes if you do get into it. I&#039;ll probably pick up a copy if it&#039;s under $20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at the profit margins for two of the biggest self-publishing services right now, lulu and Createspace? It&#8217;s better with Createspace than lulu, but the basics are that you can price a book at what you wish while keeping it affordable. Sounds great, until you factor in that you have to pay one or two editors (at anywhere from $10-$20 per 1K or words) to go over it and then pay an artist to design the image and layout of your cover and that comes out of the sales before you start actually seeing profits from your book. If you factor in those costs with the price of the book on top of the take the self-publishing service takes (pretty much the same cut as a mmpb publisher for only half the work) you are getting into territory that is prohibitive. Your collectibles buyer market will buy collectible books for $30-$40 a pop or more because the product they were buying was quality and not something they could find on the shelves of the local bookstores. Those kind of buyers won&#8217;t necessarily buy a TPB for that price. Part of the problem with the self-publishing services is the issue of quality; pages missing, upside-down pages, missing text or ink smears and these aren&#8217;t problems caused by the author but by the printer. No one is printing off a few copies to make sure it&#8217;s coming out right before they print up a hundred or a thousand copies because they are printed individually and thirty or forty different authors a day. A few dozen crappy copies go out and you have the same problem you mentioned about the collectibles market. </p>
<p>Then onto the cost of promotion. With a fanbase like yours it&#8217;s not that much of an issue unless you want to widen your fanbase to increase sales so you can pay off those services you hired to help get it done right before the book hit print. You want to start seeing profit after forking out three grand or more for editing and artwork. The harsh reality of self-publishing is that it&#8217;s not generally a good way to make money without putting out money and doing a lot of what your mmpb publisher does behind the scenes. If you want some good reading material google The Celestine Prophecy. That is a self-publishing success story. The author had already sold hundreds of thousands of copies before being bombarded by offers from publishing houses and sold a million copies after appearing on Oprah. I think the best think to do would be to do serious research on success vs cost of individual self-publishers and ask around at your current publishing houses in regards to how self-publishing might affect your relationship with them. </p>
<p>Best wishes if you do get into it. I&#8217;ll probably pick up a copy if it&#8217;s under $20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cullen Bunn</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8622</link>
		<dc:creator>Cullen Bunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8622</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve considered going the Kindle or CreateSpace route for some of my previously published short stories or maybe a short story collection. I believe that a number of my comics fans would be interested in some of my short stories, if not an entire book of them, and this might be a simple way for me to have something a little different to sell at conventions. I&#039;ve also considered using CreateSpace to put together a scriptbook (again primarily to sell at comic conventions). In both cases, I have specific goals in mind and a specific purpose, and it&#039;s easier for me to guess how many copies I&#039;d sell based on previous experience.

I&#039;m not sure if I have the time to &quot;do it right,&quot; though, so I haven&#039;t really pursued it. 

But this has gotten me thinking again ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve considered going the Kindle or CreateSpace route for some of my previously published short stories or maybe a short story collection. I believe that a number of my comics fans would be interested in some of my short stories, if not an entire book of them, and this might be a simple way for me to have something a little different to sell at conventions. I&#8217;ve also considered using CreateSpace to put together a scriptbook (again primarily to sell at comic conventions). In both cases, I have specific goals in mind and a specific purpose, and it&#8217;s easier for me to guess how many copies I&#8217;d sell based on previous experience.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I have the time to &#8220;do it right,&#8221; though, so I haven&#8217;t really pursued it. </p>
<p>But this has gotten me thinking again &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich ristow</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8601</link>
		<dc:creator>rich ristow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8601</guid>
		<description>Oh, and before somebody scrambles all over themselves to point out &quot;Walt Whitman self-pubbed leaves of grass&quot; I was meaning this and the 20th century and the phenomenon of ignorance to contemporary poetry by a lot of self publishing poets.

And, also, I realized that my comment is about self publishing in general, not the crux of what Bryan was asking in his post.  I don&#039;t see it as self publishing in an exact sense if you&#039;re republishing a reprint that has gone the other route first.  Personally, I think there are a lot of older titles by veteran writers I&#039;d love to see back in print.  T.M. Wright instantly comes to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and before somebody scrambles all over themselves to point out &#8220;Walt Whitman self-pubbed leaves of grass&#8221; I was meaning this and the 20th century and the phenomenon of ignorance to contemporary poetry by a lot of self publishing poets.</p>
<p>And, also, I realized that my comment is about self publishing in general, not the crux of what Bryan was asking in his post.  I don&#8217;t see it as self publishing in an exact sense if you&#8217;re republishing a reprint that has gone the other route first.  Personally, I think there are a lot of older titles by veteran writers I&#8217;d love to see back in print.  T.M. Wright instantly comes to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich ristow</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8600</link>
		<dc:creator>rich ristow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8600</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is a great post, and an interesting conversation.  However, I do feel the need to point out one thing that&#039;s being missed and frequently brought up.  Self publishing poetry is an abysmally bad, terrible idea -- if you ever want to be taken seriously by other poets and the legitimate publishing sphere around poetry -- which is also small press, academic press, and New York City houses -- whether it&#039;s your small chapbook/broadside publisher up to a press like the University of Pittsburgh, Graywolf, Ecco, or Penguin.   Just like how genre publishing looks down at self-published horror, fantasy, and sci-fi novels, much of the poetry establishment treats self published poets as clueless novices.  And most of the times that is exactly what they are.  

Take a moment to browse the poetry section at Barnes and Noble (yes, they do have one).  There, more than any other place in the store you see established writers rubbing book covers with iUniverse and Publish America.  Everybody from the mega poetry &quot;brand names&quot; like Maya Angelou and Robert Bly to some of the more lesser knowns (to people outside poetry) like Frank Bidart, Marie Howe, and Paul Guest to Blue Mountain Arts greeting card hacks can be found there.  And you know what, I have yet to see a self published  book of poetry on those shelves that is actually of any quality.  

But then again, it gets back to a few drums I often beat publically.  A lot of people who claim to write poetry don&#039;t know a whole lot about it, as a genre, a literary heritage, or a cultural phenomenon.  But, yet somehow, it&#039;s okay to pen a bunch of navel gazing drivel, self publish it, and call yourself a &quot;poet&quot; because you&#039;re talking about &quot;feelings&quot; and such.

I don&#039;t want to be somebody who takes a crap on somebody because they wanted to collect their personal writings together into one volume.  If that fulfills an emotional need, good for them.  But the instant it gets marketed to me as &quot;poetry&quot; ... well then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is a great post, and an interesting conversation.  However, I do feel the need to point out one thing that&#8217;s being missed and frequently brought up.  Self publishing poetry is an abysmally bad, terrible idea &#8212; if you ever want to be taken seriously by other poets and the legitimate publishing sphere around poetry &#8212; which is also small press, academic press, and New York City houses &#8212; whether it&#8217;s your small chapbook/broadside publisher up to a press like the University of Pittsburgh, Graywolf, Ecco, or Penguin.   Just like how genre publishing looks down at self-published horror, fantasy, and sci-fi novels, much of the poetry establishment treats self published poets as clueless novices.  And most of the times that is exactly what they are.  </p>
<p>Take a moment to browse the poetry section at Barnes and Noble (yes, they do have one).  There, more than any other place in the store you see established writers rubbing book covers with iUniverse and Publish America.  Everybody from the mega poetry &#8220;brand names&#8221; like Maya Angelou and Robert Bly to some of the more lesser knowns (to people outside poetry) like Frank Bidart, Marie Howe, and Paul Guest to Blue Mountain Arts greeting card hacks can be found there.  And you know what, I have yet to see a self published  book of poetry on those shelves that is actually of any quality.  </p>
<p>But then again, it gets back to a few drums I often beat publically.  A lot of people who claim to write poetry don&#8217;t know a whole lot about it, as a genre, a literary heritage, or a cultural phenomenon.  But, yet somehow, it&#8217;s okay to pen a bunch of navel gazing drivel, self publish it, and call yourself a &#8220;poet&#8221; because you&#8217;re talking about &#8220;feelings&#8221; and such.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to be somebody who takes a crap on somebody because they wanted to collect their personal writings together into one volume.  If that fulfills an emotional need, good for them.  But the instant it gets marketed to me as &#8220;poetry&#8221; &#8230; well then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brother odd</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8596</link>
		<dc:creator>brother odd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8596</guid>
		<description>Sounds like if you go with a E-Format on some of your backlist ,your in easy money. I think if you go with a POD route on your reprints you do Ok little more work for yourself  this way! With both Format E/POD I would put legnhty forwords or afterword and extras to help increase sale! ...Original stuff would be more work but with a higher sale if done right i.e advertise, advertise, advertise. So get the word out and you&#039;ll do just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like if you go with a E-Format on some of your backlist ,your in easy money. I think if you go with a POD route on your reprints you do Ok little more work for yourself  this way! With both Format E/POD I would put legnhty forwords or afterword and extras to help increase sale! &#8230;Original stuff would be more work but with a higher sale if done right i.e advertise, advertise, advertise. So get the word out and you&#8217;ll do just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kemper</title>
		<link>http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265&#038;cpage=3#comment-8594</link>
		<dc:creator>Kemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankeene.com/?p=3265#comment-8594</guid>
		<description>Sell advertising on your books.  Back cover, wherever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sell advertising on your books.  Back cover, wherever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
